4.8 Article

Pyoverdine secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a biological recognition element for the fluorescent detection of furazolidone

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 90-96

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.07.038

关键词

Furazolidone; Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA1; Pyoverdine; Fluorescent detection

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-EW-206]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31200041, 21275158]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry
  4. 100 Talents Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methods for the rapid and sensitive detection of furazolidone, a pesticide used for the treatment of infections of animals and human beings, have been urgently recommended for its large residual, strong carcinogenicity and genotoxicity in the environment. In this study, a method for the detection of furazolidone based on the rapid fluorescence quenching of pyoverdine by furazolidone was developed. Pyoverdine secreted by a Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA1 was purified through affinity chromatography and its fluorescent property was characterized. The fluorescence of pyoverdine could be quenched by furazolidone with specificity, and based on this phenomenon a fluorescent method for furazolidone detection was established. Fluorescence of pyoverdine was quenched by furazolidone probably due to the electron transfer from pyoverdine to furazolidone. The optimal pH for the detection was 7.2 in 50 mM 3-(N-Morpholino) propanesulfonic acid solution, and the whole detection process could be completed within a few seconds. The linear range of the detection was 2-160 mu M and the limit of detection (LOD) was 0.5 mu M. This study developed a novel fluorescent method for furazolidone detection, and the rapid and specific fluorescent biosensor can be potentially applied for furazolidone detection in the aquatic samples. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据