4.8 Article

Cobalt selenide decorated carbon spheres for excellent cycling performance of sodium ion batteries

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 19-28

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.12.014

关键词

Cobalt selenide; Sodium ion batteries; Chalcogenides; Pseudocapacitance; Activation process

资金

  1. National Key R & D Program of China [2016YFA0200102]
  2. NSFC [51631001, 51590882, 51672010]
  3. NSFC-RGC Joint Research Scheme [51361165201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development of electrode materials with high capacity, superior rate performance, long cycle life and low cost is critical to commercialize sodium ion batteries (SIBs). Herein, a unique composite consisted of cobalt selenide (Co0.89Se) nanoparticles (3-10 nm) embedded in carbon spheres (CoSe@CSs) is presented as anode for SIBs. The exclusive structure of CoSe@CSs enables the pseudocapacitive charge storage, improves the electronic properties and provides buffer for volumetric changes during the repeated charge-discharge processes. The composite with an average diameter of similar to 100 nm, denoted as CoSe@100CSs, presented the best electrochemical performance (with a reversible charge storage capacity of 554 mA h g(-1) after 50 cycles at a rate of 100 mA g(-1)) when compared with composites of 300 nm and 500 nm diameters and also pure CoSe. Additional to high storage capacity, the CoSe@100CSs also showed excellent rate capability and ultra-long cycling life when examined at higher discharge rates. Storage capacities are as high as 350 mA h g(-1) at the rate of 1000 mA g(-1) and 260 mA h g(-1) at the rate of 4000 mA g(-1) after 4000 and even 10,000 cycles, respectively. Hence, due to this synergetic effect of uniformly distributed cobalt selenide nanoparticles and carbon matrix, the CoSe@CSs composite exhibits exceptional electrochemical performance for SIBs. This strategy is expected to open up new methodologies for the development of advanced electrode materials of high performance SIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据