4.8 Article

Promoting oxygen evolution reaction by RuO2 nanoparticles in solid oxide CO2 electrolyzer

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 207-214

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.01.013

关键词

Oxygen evolution reaction; Carbon dioxide electrolysis; Solid oxide electrolysis cells; Ruthenium oxide nanoparticles; Strontium doped lanthanum manganite/yttria-stabilized zirconia (LSM/YSZ) composite

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFB0600901]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21573222, 21703237, 91545202]
  3. Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics [DICP DMTO201702]
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB17020200]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M600220]
  6. CAS Youth Innovation Promotion [2015145]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electro-reduction of CO2 to CO via high-temperature solid oxide electrolysis cell (HT-SOEC) is an effective approach to reduce CO2 emissions and alleviate global warming effect. Significant efforts have been devoted to developing efficient electrode materials for accelerating the sluggish oxygen evolution reaction (OER) occurred at the SOEC anode. Herein, we report that RuO2 nanoparticles possess excellent OER activity at 800 degrees C and can notably promote the OER performance of strontium doped lanthanum manganite/yttria-stabilized zirconia (LSM/YSZ) anode in solid oxide CO2 electrolyzer. The current density is improved from 0.46 A cm(-2) to 0.74 A cm(-2) at 1.2 V and 800 degrees C after anchoring 6 wt.% RuO2 onto the surface of LSM/YSZ composite electrode, with the greatest enhancement of 60%. Characterizations of X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, temperature-programmed desorption of oxygen and transmission electron microscopy suggest that the combination of improved oxygen vacancies on the LSM/YSZ backbone and intrinsic OER activity of RuO2 nanoparticles greatly promote the OER performance in solid oxide CO2 electrolyzer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据