4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Real time monitoring of thrombin interactions with its aptamers: Insights into the sandwich complex formation

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 186-192

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.07.016

关键词

Thrombin aptamer; Sandwich complex formation; Surface plasmon resonance imaging; Real time monitoring

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aptamers are raising an increasing interest for biosensor applications as replacements for antibodies due to their high stability and low cost. Thrombin, a key enzyme in the coagulation cascade, is an archetypical target against which two different aptamers, binding to two different exosites, have been selected. Recent studies dedicated to thrombin monitoring applications of biosensors have taken advantage of a potential sandwich-like structure between thrombin and these two aptamers for amplification purposes. However, in most cases, only end-point analysis was observed as a result of labeling requirements, thus preventing access to the kinetics of the complex formation. By using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) imaging of aptamer-functionalized biosensors, we followed the binding of thrombin on the sensor and its interaction with a second reporter aptamer in real-time and in a label-free manner. Surprisingly, we showed that the injection of a second unlabeled-aptamer following the previous thrombin injection destabilized the thrombin-aptamer complex formed on the sensor surface, thus limiting any further amplification. However, the direct co-injection of thrombin, pre-complexed with a biotinylated aptamer bound to streptavidin efficiently increased the SPR signal by comparison to single thrombin detection. The various injection sequences performed may be rationalized considering a poor selectivity of one of the aptamers towards its exosite and a further negative allosteric effect upon sandwich complexation of the thrombin with its aptamers. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据