4.4 Review

Neuroblastoma pathogenesis: deregulation of embryonic neural crest development

期刊

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 372, 期 2, 页码 245-262

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-017-2747-0

关键词

Neuroblastoma; Neural crest; Cancer stem cells; G-CSF receptor (CD114)

资金

  1. NIH [R01 CA174808]
  2. Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation
  3. Gilson-Longenbaugh Foundation
  4. Children's Neuroblastoma Research Foundation
  5. Wipe Out Kids' Cancer Foundation
  6. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  7. Cancer Preventions & Research Institute of Texas [CPRIT RP160283]
  8. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA174808] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuroblastoma (NB) is an aggressive pediatric cancer that originates from neural crest tissues of the sympathetic nervous system. NB is highly heterogeneous both from a clinical and a molecular perspective. Clinically, this cancer represents a wide range of phenotypes ranging from spontaneous regression of 4S disease to unremitting treatment-refractory progression and death of high-risk metastatic disease. At a cellular level, the heterogeneous behavior of NB likely arises from an arrest and deregulation of normal neural crest development. In the present review, we summarize our current knowledge of neural crest development as it relates to pathways promoting 'stemness' and how deregulation may contribute to the development of tumor-initiating CSCs. There is an emerging consensus that such tumor subpopulations contribute to the evolution of drug resistance, metastasis and relapse in other equally aggressive malignancies. As relapsed, refractory disease remains the primary cause of death for neuroblastoma, the identification and targeting of CSCs or other primary drivers of tumor progression remains a critical, clinically significant goal for neuroblastoma. We will critically review recent and past evidence in the literature supporting the concept of CSCs as drivers of neuroblastoma pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据