4.8 Article

Improving Li anode performance by a porous 3D carbon paper host with plasma assisted sponge carbon coating

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 47-56

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.09.011

关键词

Lithium metal batteries; Li metal protection; Solid electrolyte interphase; 3D matrix host; Sponge carbon coating

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development of China [2016YFB0700202]
  2. Instrument Developing Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [yz201328]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Q17E020023]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51650110490]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51502315]
  6. International Cooperation Project of Ningbo [2016D10011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Li metal has been regarded as the most promising anode material for next high-energy batteries. However, the high capacity of Li metal (3860 mA h g(-1)) is severely counteracted by the loss in side reactions at its unstable Li/electrolyte interface. Herein, we prepare a special composite, by growing a high-quality Sponge Carbon layer onto a 3D Carbon Paper (SCCP). During initial stage of Li deposition, Li ions are intercalated in the carbon paper skeletons then followed by Li metal plating, enabling the entire Li metal deposition underneath the sponge carbon layer. Such a conformal surface accommodation with modulated Li metal deposition provides highly stable Li/electrolyte interfaces. The Coulombic efficiencies for Li plating at 3 and 4 mA h cm(-2) are as high as 98-99% in the SCCP, obtained in corrosive carbonate electrolytes. Paired with high areal capacity LiFePO4 cathodes (similar to 1.8 mA h cm(-2)), a SCCP protected Li foil can still keep its metal luster after 650 cycles, in sharp contrast to a side products covered surface observed on naked Li foil after 400 cycles. These results clearly demonstrate the ability of the SCCP to stabilize Li surface, which may be applied in Li metal batteries for long-term operation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据