4.5 Article

Life-course determinants of cognitive reserve (CR) in cognitive aging and dementia - a systematic literature review

期刊

AGING & MENTAL HEALTH
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 915-926

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1348471

关键词

Dementia and cognitive disorders; psychosocial and cultural aspects; quantitative methods and statistics; neuroimaging; biological markers

资金

  1. University of Aberdeen [CF10189-10]
  2. Roland Sutton Academic Trust [0041/R/16]
  3. Farr Institute @ Scotland
  4. Arthritis Research UK
  5. British Heart Foundation
  6. Cancer Research UK
  7. Economic and Social Research Council
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  9. Medical Research Council
  10. National Institute of Health Research
  11. National Institute for Social Care and Health Research (Welsh Assembly Government)
  12. Chief Scientist Office (Scottish Government Health Directorates)
  13. Wellcome Trust [MRC] [MR/K007017/1]
  14. MRC [MR/K007017/1, MR/M501633/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The concept of cognitive reserve (CR) is defined as a moderator, which allows an individual to preserve cognition despite underlying brain pathology. There is no consensus of what potentially modifiable CR determinants are of greatest importance. The aim of this review was to identify life-course factors which protect older individuals from expressing cognitive decline despite the presence of brain pathology.Method: A systematic review search was performed in MEDLINE (1946-06/09/13), EMBASE (1947-06/09/13), and PsycheInfo (1967-06/09/13). We included studies examining CR in the context of the four commonest subtypes of dementia, mild cognitive impairment or healthy aging. Studies which combined measurement of underlying dementia-related neuropathology, cognitive function, and factors providing CR in a single model were accepted. We performed a qualitative synthesis of the results.Results: Thirty-four studies out of 9229 screened records met our inclusion criteria and were therefore quality assessed and data extracted. Variation in CR definition made comparison across studies difficult. One hundred and forty-four out of 156 models examined education and occupation: overall, 58% of eligible models classified education and 60% occupation as a CR determinant, with 12% and 44% of those, respectively, being of high quality. Within healthy population suitable to inform preventative interventions, there was consistent evidence for education having a protective effect on general cognition in the face of multiple brain burden measures, while occupation presented inconclusive results within cognitive groups.Conclusions: Further research on modifiable determinants of CR beyond education/occupation including early-life factors and consensus on CR definition are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据