4.8 Article

An ultrasensitive fluorescent aptasensor for adenosine detection based on exonuclease III assisted signal amplification

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 83-87

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.01.022

关键词

Aptamer; Graphene oxide; Exonuclease III

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21075116, 20935003]
  2. 973 Project [2011CB911002, 2010CB933003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report here a graphene oxide (GO)-based fluorescent aptasensor for adenosine detection by employing exonuclease III (Exo III) as a signal amplifying element. In the absence of adenosine, the adenosine aptamers hybridized with the complementary DNA (cDNA), and the Exo III could not cleave the single-strand signal probes labeled with carboxylfluorescein (FAM) at its 5' ends. When the graphene oxide was finally added, it could strongly adsorb the single-strand signal probes and quenched the fluorophore effectively. In the presence of adenosine, the aptamers associated with the targets, which led to the formation of duplex DNAs between the cDNAs and the signal probes. The Exo III thereafter could digest the duplex DNAs from 3' blunt terminus of signal probes, liberating the fluorophore. Upon adding the GO, the fluorophore could not be adsorbed and quenched. By coupling cyclic enzymatic cleavage, a remarkable fluorescent increase was obtained. Due to the specific recognition ability of the aptamer for the target and the powerful quenching property of GO for signal probe, this proposed approach has a good selectivity and high sensitivity for adenosine. In the optimum conditions described, >100% signal enhancement was achieved and a limit of detection as low as 1 nM was obtained, which is lower than those of commonly used fluorescent aptamer sensors. Moreover, the biosensor exhibited an ultrahigh sensitivity and held a versatile platform for clinical diagnostics, molecular biology and drug developments. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据