4.8 Article

Molecularly imprinted polymer anchored on the surface of denatured bovine serum albumin modified CdTe quantum dots as fluorescent artificial receptor for recognition of target protein

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 84-89

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.09.042

关键词

Molecular imprinting; Quantum dots; Denatured bovine serum albumin; Artificial receptors; Selective protein recognition

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB707703, 2007CB914100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21075069, 20875049]
  3. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [11JCZDJC21700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new type of molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-based fluorescent artificial receptor was developed by anchoring MIP on the surface of denatured bovine serum albumin (dBSA) modified CdTe quantum dots (QDs) using the surface molecular imprinting process. The approach combined the merits of molecular imprinting technology and the fluorescent property of the CdTe QDs. The dBSA was used not only to modify the surface defects of the CdTe QDs, but also as assistant monomer to create effective recognition sites. Three different proteins, namely lysozyme (Lyz), cytochrome c (Cyt) and methylated bovine serum albumin (mBSA), were tested as the template molecules and then the receptors were synthesized by sol-gel reaction (imprinting process). The results of fluorescence and binding experiments demonstrated the recognition performance of the receptors toward the corresponding template. Under optimum conditions, the linear range for Lyz was from 1.4 x 10(-8) to 8.5 x 10(-6) M, and the detection limit was 6.8 nM. Moreover, the new artificial receptors were applied to separate and detect Lyz in real samples. This fluorescent artificial receptor may serve as a starting point in the design of highly effective synthetic fluorescent receptor for recognition of target protein. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据