4.8 Article

Voltammetric investigation of DNA damage induced by nitrofurazone and short-lived nitro-radicals with the use of an electrochemical DNA biosensor

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 245-251

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.05.034

关键词

dsDNA/GCE biosensor; Nitrofurazone; DNA-damage; Nitro-radicals; Atomic force microcopy; Co(phen)(3)(2+) probe

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-21065007]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology of Nanchang University [SKLF-MB-201002, SKLF-TS-200919]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical behavior of nitrofurazone (NFZ) was investigated with the use of cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) methods. The pH-dependence of NFZ was studied at a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) in ethanol/Britton-Robinson buffer (30:70), and short-lived nitro-radicals were generated by the reduction of NFZ at high pHs (>7.0). In the presence of DNA, the DPV peak current of NFZ decreased and the peak potential shifted negatively, which indicated that there was an electrostatic interaction between NFZ and DNA. An electrochemical dsDNA/GCE biosensor was prepared to study the DNA damage produced in the presence NFZ; this process was followed with the use of the Co(phen)(3)(2+) electroactive probe. Also, the oxidation peaks of guanosine (750 mV) and adenosine (980 mV) indicated that DNA damage was related directly to the nitro-radicals. Experiments demonstrated that DNA damage occurred via two different steps while NFZ was metabolized and nitroradicals were produced. Novel work with AFM on the NFZ/DNA interaction supported the suggestion that in vivo, the nitro-radicals were more cytotoxic than the NFZ molecules. A linear DPV calibration plot was obtained for NFZ analysis at a modified dsDNA/GCE (concentration range: 2.50 x 10(-6)-3.75 x 10(-5) mol L-1; limit of detection: 8.0 x 10(-7) mol L-1), and NFZ was determined successfully in pharmaceutical samples. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据