4.8 Article

Ultrasensitive chemiluminescence quantification of single-nucleotide polymorphisms by using monobase-modified Au and CuS nanoparticles

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 1082-1087

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.09.034

关键词

Chemiluminescence (CL); Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs); Anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV); Nanoparticle (NP); Luminol-CN--Cu2+

资金

  1. Doctoral Foundation of Qing-dao University of Science and Technology [QUST 0022272]
  2. Excellent Young Scientists Encouragement Foundation of Shandong Province [2008BS05004]
  3. Educational Administration of Shandong Province [J07YC09]
  4. National Nature Science Foundation of China [20975059]
  5. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB732404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ultrasensitive chemiluminescence method based on the Au nanoparticles amplification for the quantitative detection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genomic DNA was accomplished by the DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment)-induced coupling of the nucleotide-modified nanoparticle probe to the mutant sites of duplex DNA under the Watson-Crick base-pairing rule. The concentration of the one-base mutant DNA was determined by chemiluminescence (CL) detection of the cupric ions dissolved from the CuS nanoparticles (NPs) modified on the Au NPs. The incorporation of Au NPs in this method significantly enhanced the sensitivity because a single Au NP can be loaded with 77 CuS NPs through the link-age of an amidization reaction between mercaptoacetic acid on the surface of Au NPs and aminoethanethiol on the surface of CuS NPs. A preconcentration process of cupric ions performed by anodic stripping voltammetric (ASV) technology further increased the sensitivity of the design for about 10-fold. As a result of these two combined effects, this method could detect as low as 19 aM SNPs and the linear range for SNPs was from 8.0 x 10(-17) to 1.0 x 10(-14) M. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据