4.8 Article

Protein discrimination by fluorescent sensor array constituted of variously charged dendritic phenylene-ethynylene fluorophores

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 863-867

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.07.096

关键词

Dendrimer; Fluorescence; Principal component analysis; Protein identification; Sensor array

资金

  1. National Nanotechnology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand (NANOTEC, NSTDA) [NN-B-22-FN9-10-52-06]
  2. Thailand Research Fund (TRF)
  3. Thai Government [TKK2555, SP2]
  4. Center for Petroleum, Petrochemicals and Advanced Materials, Chulalongkorn University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A protein fluorescent sensor array based on variously charged dendritic fluorophores is developed. The variation of charge is achieved by different combinations of cationic trimethylammonium, anionic carboxylate and non-ionic methyl ester or N,N-dimethylamino on the peripheries of the fluorophores. Nine phenylene-ethynylene dendritic fluorophores, seven zeroth generation bearing charges varied from -3 to +3 and two first generation bearing -6 and +6 charges, are synthesized from triiodotriphenylamine through series of Sonogashira coupling. In phosphate buffer saline pH 7.4, five out of these nine compounds fluorogenically response to eight protein analytes distinctively. The data set of fluorescent intensities obtained from 5 fluorophores x 8 proteins x 9 replicated measurements can be statistically sorted into eight clusters corresponding to each protein by principal component analysis (PCA). Factorial discriminant analysis (FDA) cross-validation is applied to locate the optimum detection wavelength and reduce the number of sensing elements from nine to two with 100% discriminating accuracy. The method described should be generally practical for the development of electronic tongue for protein related food analysis and medical diagnosis. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据