4.4 Article

Determination of testosterone esters in the hair of male greyhound dogs using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry

期刊

DRUG TESTING AND ANALYSIS
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 460-473

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dta.2236

关键词

anabolic steroid; doping control; greyhound; hair; LC-HRMS; testosterone ester

资金

  1. Greyhound Racing Victoria, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The doping of greyhound dogs with testosterone is done in an attempt to improve their athletic performance, but such doping cannot easily be confirmed, especially in male dogs owing to the natural presence of endogenous testosterone. As testosterone is usually administered as its esters, their direct detection in hair would provide confirmatory evidence of the administration of a pharmaceutical product. This article demonstrates that the use of a liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry method with heated electrospray ionisation (HESI) combined with the use of amino solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges for sample clean-up, is suitable for the sensitive determination of propionate, phenyl propionate, isocaproate, decanoate, and enanthate esters of testosterone in greyhound hair. The method is linear over the range, 0.1g/kg-10g/kg, for all the testosterone esters analysed. The limits of detection (LOD) are 0.05g/kg for testosterone phenyl propionate, isocaproate, and decanoate, 0.025g/kg for testosterone propionate, and 0.25g/kg for testosterone enanthate. This method was applied to hair samples collected from male greyhounds before and after a single administration of a product containing several testosterone esters, each of which could be detected up to 100days post-administration. The study also demonstrates that tail hair is the specimen of choice for the analysis of testosterone in dog hair and that washing of dogs does not impact the analysis of testosterone esters in hair. This method may be useful in racing regulation for the detection of illegitimate use of testosterone in all species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据