4.8 Article

Enhancing dopamine detection using a glassy carbon electrode modified with MWCNTs, quercetin, and Nafion®

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 3504-3509

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.05.003

关键词

Dopamine determination; Ascorbic acid; Multi-wall carbon nanotubes; Quercetin; Nafion (R); Flow injection analysis

资金

  1. National Research Council of the Republic of China (Taiwan) [NSC 96-2220E-006-015, NSC 97-2220-E-006-008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glassy carbon (CC) electrode was modified using multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), quercetin (Q) and Nafion (R) in this sequence. The thus modified electrode was used for the detection of dopamine (DA) in the presence of equimolar ascorbic acid (AA). It is demonstrated in this study that MWCNTs can increase the current response of DA by five-fold and Q can reduce the oxidation overpotential of DA by about 60 mV, compared to these parameters obtained with a bare GC electrode. It is also shown that a layer of Nafion (R) can virtually eliminate the interference of AA for the detection of DA. The GC/MWCNTs/Q/Nafion (R) electrode (hereafter also called composite electrode) shows a current density of about 900 mu A cm(-2) for DA, compared to the value of 80 mu A cm(-2) of the GC electrode and to the value of 390 mu A cm(-2) of the GC/MWCNTs electrode. The 11-fold enhancement in the sensitivity of the GC electrode for DA determination is attributed to the composite modification of the electrode, and is substantiated through various cyclic voltammetric experiments. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and linear sweep voltammetry were used to characterize the electrodes. Calibration curves of batch and flow systems were obtained by amperometry for the detection of DA. Additionally, the composite modified electrode was tested with a human serum sample for the determination of DA and was found to be promising at our preliminary experiments. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据