4.8 Article

Immunosensors for detection of Annexin II and MUC5AC for early diagnosis of lung cancer

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 456-462

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.08.007

关键词

Amperometric immunosensors; Annexin II; MUC5AC; Gold nanoparticles; Conducting polymer

资金

  1. Korean Ministry of Environment [091-082-078]
  2. U.S. Department of Defense VITAL [W81XW-04-1-0142]
  3. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) [20080900100780] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amperometric immunosensors were developed to diagnose lung cancer through the detection of Annexin II and MUC5AC. To fabricate the sensor probe, a conducting polymer (poly-terthiophene carboxylic acid; poly-TTCA) was electropolymerized onto a gold nanoparticle/glassy carbon electrode (AuNP/GCE) and a dendrimer (Den) was covalently bonded to the poly-TTCA through amide bond formation, where AuNPs were doped onto the dendrimer. To obtain the final sensor probe, an antibody (anti-Annexin II) and hydrazine (Hyd), which is a catalyst for the reduction of H2O2 generated by glucose oxidase (GOx), were covalently attached onto the Den/AuNP-modified surface. Each surface was then characterized by SEM, impedance spectroscopy and XPS. The final sensor probe was examined before and after interaction with Annexin II and MUC5AC using impedance-spectroscopic, quartz crystal microbalance and amperometric methods. The performance of the immunosensor for the Annexin II was evaluated for the apical surface fluid labeled with GOx by the standard addition method. In this case, the detection limit of the proposed method was 0.051 ng/mL (k = 3, n = 5). The Annexin II concentration in the secretions collected from squamous metaplastic cells was determined to be 280 +/- 8.0 pg/mL (n = 5). (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据