4.8 Article

Strip-based immunochromatographic assay using specific egg yolk antibodies for rapid detection of morphine in urine samples

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 502-505

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.07.018

关键词

Egg yolk antibody; Morphine; Gold nanoparticles; Immunochromatographic kit

资金

  1. Central Forensic Science Laboratory
  2. IMTECH Chandigarh, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using specific egg yolk antibodies (IgY), a strip-based immunochromatographic assay was developed for rapid detection of morphine in urine samples. IgY type antibody against morphine was generated by immunizing chickens with well-characterized monoacetyl morphine-protein conjugate. The antibody was labeled with gold nanoparticles and used as an immunoprobe in the dipstick format for the visual detection of morphine in urine samples. The dipstick was developed using three membranes: an application pad made of glass. fiber membrane to hold the tracer, a signal generation test line on nitrocellulose membrane (detection zone) and a cellulose membrane used as an absorption pad. Analytes of interest (morphine and its analogues) added to the sample well, dissolved the labeled antibody (tracer), and the antigen-antibody complex formed was transported by the flow caused by capillary action to the test line. The color signal of test line in proportion to the morphine concentration in urine samples was measured using a detector. The developed dipstick assay format was optimized, showing the average IC50 values of morphine as low as 9.45 ng/mL, the detection range of 1-1000 ng/mL and the lowest detection limit 2.5 ng/mL under optimal conditions of analysis. The correlation between the developed dipstick and ELISA was 0.948 in the analysis of urine samples spiked with morphine. The developed dipstick could be a highly sensitive and convenient tool for rapid detection of opiate drugs in samples with high degree of stability. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据