4.7 Article

Computational insights into the G-protein-biased activation and inactivation mechanisms of the mu opioid receptor

期刊

ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 154-164

出版社

ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA
DOI: 10.1038/aps.2017.158

关键词

G-protein-coupled receptor; mu opioid receptor; molecular dynamics; activation switch; G-protein bias; beta-arrestin signaling; TRV130; BU72; beta-FNA; naltrexone

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81673356, U1603122]
  2. 111 Project [B07023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mu opioid receptor (OR), a member of the class A subfamily of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), is a major target for the treatment of pain. G-protein biased mu-OR agonists promise to be developed as analgesics. Thus, TRV130, the first representative mu-OR ligand with G-protein bias, has entered into phase III clinical trials. To identify the detailed G-protein-biased activation and inactivation mechanisms of the mu-OR, we constructed five mu-OR systems that were in complexes with the G-protein-biased agonists TRV130 and BU72, the antagonists beta-FNA and naltrexone, as well as the free receptor. We performed a series of conventional molecular dynamics simulations and analyses of G-protein-biased activation and inactivation mechanisms of mu-OR. Our results, together with previously reported mutation results, revealed the operating mode of the activation switch composed of residues W-6.48 and Y-7.43 (Ballesteros/Weinstein numbering), the activity of which was responsible for down-and up-regulation, respectively, of the beta-arrestin signaling, which in turn affected G-protein-biased activation of mu-OR. TRV130 was found to stabilize W-6.48 by interacting with Y-7.43. In addition, we obtained useful information regarding mu-OR-biased activation, such as strong stabilization of W-7.35 through a hydrophobic ring interaction in the TRV130 system. These findings may facilitate understanding of mu-OR biased activation and the design of new biased ligands for GPCRs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据