4.8 Article

Silver salts of aromatic thiols applicable as core materials of molecular sensors operating via SERS and fluorescence

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 3615-3621

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.05.025

关键词

Silver aromatic thiolates; Surface-enhanced Raman scattering; Fluorescence; Multiplex immunoassay; Biotin-streptavidin interaction; Antigen-antibody binding

资金

  1. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation [R11-2007-012-02002-0]
  2. Korea Research Foundation [KRF-2008-313-C00390, KRF-2008-313-C00411]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [R11-2007-012-02002-0, 2008-313-C00411, 2008-313-C00390] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have developed dual-tagging sensors, operating via both Raman and fluorescence spectroscopy, composed of silver aromatic thiolates (AgSRs) modified with fluorescent organic dye for multiplex immunoassays. Owing to the photo-induced production of SERS-active Ag nanoparticles, AgSRs exhibit the surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectra of corresponding thiols. The fluorescence dye-modified AgSRs were accordingly fabricated using dye-grafted polyelectrolytes during layer-by-layer deposition of cationic and anionic polyelectrolytes onto AgSRs. In the final stage, the tagging sensors assembled with either specific biotin group or specific antibodies (anti-h-IgG or anti-r-IgG) were employed to detect either streptavidin molecules or target antigens (h-IgG or r-IgG), respectively. Since numerous AgSRs can be used as the core materials, multiple bioassays are expected to be accomplishable using the present methodology. The fluorescence signal may be used as an immediate indicator of molecular recognition, while the SERS signals can be used subsequently as the signature of specific molecular interactions. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据