4.8 Article

Development of molecularly imprinted polymers as tailored templates for the solid-state [2+2] photodimerization

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 640-646

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.01.038

关键词

Molecularly imprinted polymer; Templated reaction; [2+2] photodimerization

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET 0828897]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) was prepared to selectively template the [2+2] photodimerization of trans-1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene. First, an MIP selective for rctt-tetrakis(4-pyridyl)cyclobutane, which is the [2+2] photodimerization product of trans- 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene, was prepared from methacrylic acid (MAA) and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA). The non-covalent MIP showed enhanced affinity for both the templating agent, rctt-tetrakis(4-pyridyl)cyclobutane, and the alkene precursor, trans- 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene. The solid-state photodimerization reaction proceeded in significantly higher yields in the presence of the MIP. Control reactions carried out in the absence of polymer gave no product, and reactions carried out in the presence of a non-imprinted polymer and an MIP imprinted with a different template, 3-hydroxymethylpyridine, gave much lower yields of the cyclobutane photodimerization product. The outcome of the MIP-templated photodimerization reaction was strongly influenced by the binding site heterogeneity of the non-covalently imprinted polymers. For example, higher yields were observed with decreasing olefin loadings levels on the MIPs. This binding site heterogeneity was characterized via application of the Freundlich binding model to the experimentally measured binding isotherms. These confirmed that the non-covalent MIPs had very few high-affinity binding sites, which greatly limits the capacity and ultimately the utility of these materials as templates in synthetic organic applications. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据