4.8 Article

Flow-injection electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of human IgG based on glucose oxidase-derivated biomimetic interface

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 2125-2130

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2008.11.008

关键词

Electrochemical immunosensor; Human IgG; Glucose oxidase; Bovine serum albumin; Biomimetic interface

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation, Germany
  2. Postgraduate Science and Technology Innovation Program
  3. SWU, China [200602]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A newly flow-through electrochemical immunosensor for monitoring IgG inhuman serum has been developed by using core-shell SiO2/Au nanocomposites and poly(amidoamine) G4 dendrimer as matrices. The ferrocenecarboaldehyde-labeled anti-IgG biomolecules were initially chemisorbed onto the nanoparticle surface, and then glucose oxidase (GOx), as a blocking reagent instead of bovine serum albumin (BSA), was backfilled onto the modified surface. The formation of the antibody-antigen complex by a simple one-step immunoreaction between the immobilized anti-IgG and IgG in sample solution introduced a barrier of direct electrical communication between the immobilized GOx and the base surface, and decreased the immobilized GOx toward the catalytic oxidation of glucose. The performance and factors influencing the performance of the immunosensor were evaluated. Under optimal conditions, the linear range of the developed immunosensor by using GOx as enhancer was from 5.0 x 10(-6) to 9.6 x 10(-4) mol/L with a detection limit of 8.0 x 10(-7) mol/L IgG (at 3 delta), while the detection limit by using BSA was 1.5 x 10(-5) mol/L IgG (at 3 delta) with the linear range from 3.5 x 10(-5) to 1.2 x 10(-3) mol/L The selectivity, reproducibility and stability of the proposed immunosensor were acceptable. The IgG contents in 37 human serum samples obtained by the proposed method are identical with the data of clinical laboratory. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据