4.8 Article

Automated and ultrasensitive detection of methyl-3-quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acid by using gold nanoparticles probes SIA-rt-PCR

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 2858-2863

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.02.015

关键词

MQCA; Gold; Superparamagnetic nanoparticles; Sequential injection analysis; rt-PCR

资金

  1. National Natural Science of Foundation [20675035]
  2. Food Laboratory of Jiangsu Import and Export Inspection and Quarantine Bureau (China)
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20871060, 20835006]
  4. 11th Five Years Key Programs for Science and Technology Development of China [2006BAK02A09, 2006BAK02A19, 2006BAK02A06, 2006BAK10B04, 2007BAK26B06, 200810099, 200810219, 2006AA10Z450, 2006BAD27B02, 2006BAF07B, 2006BAD04A0801, 2008ZX08012-001, 2006BAK02A29]
  5. 111 project [B07029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ultrasensitive and rapid sequential injection analysis (SIA) based on real-time PCR (SIA-rt-PCR) assay was developed by using different nanoparticles for the detection of small molecule chemicals residues. Gold (Au) nanoparticle, conjugated with goat anti-rabbit IgG and duplex strand DNA (dsDNA), was used as a substitute for chemiluminescent probes in an SIA system. By indirect competitive immunoreactions in the SIA system, the gold nanoparticles were attached to antigens which were immobilized by superparamagnetic nanoparticles (SMNPs). The dsDNA on the gold nanoparticles was dehybridized and then the single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) was collected and quantified with rt-PCR, which showed a rather low linearity range from 2.5 atto mol L-1 (aM) to 250 femto mol L-1 (fM) and the LOD was 1.4 aM. This method, which is rapid, automated and capable of high-throughput, was used to detect methyl-3-quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acid (MQCA) residues in real samples. The analytical results had a coefficient of variation of less than 15% and the recovery was 89-108%. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据