4.5 Article

Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: organizing principles for advancing research methods and approaches

期刊

ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

RESILIENCE ALLIANCE
DOI: 10.5751/ES-10558-230446

关键词

complex adaptive systems; normative implications; ontology; social-ecological systems; typology of systemic features and dynamics

资金

  1. Guidance for Resilience in the Anthropocene: Investments for Development (GRAID) project - Swedish International Development Agency (Sida)
  2. South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI) of the Department of Science and Technology
  3. National Research Foundation of South Africa [98766]
  4. Vetenskapsradet in Sweden [621-2014-5137]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of social-ecological systems (SES) has been significantly shaped by insights from research on complex adaptive systems (CAS). We offer a brief overview of the conceptual integration of CAS research and its implications for the advancement of SES studies and methods. We propose a conceptual typology of six organizing principles of CAS based on a comparison of leading scholars' classifications of CAS features and properties. This typology clusters together similar underlying organizing principles of the features and attributes of CAS, and serves as a heuristic framework for identifying methods and approaches that account for the key features of SES. These principles can help identify appropriate methods and approaches for studying SES. We discuss three main implications of studying and engaging with SES as CAS. First, there needs to be a shift in focus when studying the dynamics and interactions in SES, to better capture the nature of the organizing principles that characterize SES behavior. Second, realizing that the nature of the intertwined social-ecological relations is complex has real consequences for how we choose methods and practical approaches for observing and studying SES interactions. Third, engagement with SES as CAS poses normative challenges for problem-oriented researchers and practitioners taking on real-world challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据