4.8 Article

Carbon post-microarrays for glucose sensors

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 1637-1644

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2008.01.031

关键词

glucose sensor; carbon-microelectromechanical systems (C-MEMS); microarrays; polypyrrole

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel design and fabrication method of glucose sensors based on high aspect ratio carbon post-microarrays is reported in this paper. Apart from the fact that carbon has a wide electrochemical stability window, a major advantage of using carbon post-microarrays as working electrodes for an amperometric glucose sensor is the large reactive surface per unit footprint substrate area, improving sensitivity of the glucose sensor. The carbon post-microarrays were fabricated by carbon-microelectromechanical systems (C-MEMS) technology. Immobilization of enzyme onto the carbon post-electrodes was carried out through co-deposition of glucose oxidase (GOx) and electrochemically polymerized polypyrrole (PPy). Sensing performance of the glucose sensors with different post-heights and various post-densities was tested and compared. The carbon post-glucose sensors show a linear range from 0.5 mM to 20 mM and a response time of about 20 s, which are comparable to the simulation result. Sensitivity per unit footprint substrate area as large as 2.02 mA/(mM cm(2)) is achieved with the 140 mu m high (aspect ratio around 5: 1) carbon post-samples, which is two times the sensitivity per unit footprint substrate area of the flat carbon films. This result is consistent with the hypothesis that the number of reaction sites scales with the reactive surface area of the sensor. Numerical simulation based on enzymatic reaction and glucose diffusion kinetics gives the optimum geometric design rules for the carbon post-glucose sensor. Glucose sensors with even higher sensitivity can be achieved utilizing higher carbon post-microarrays when technology evolution will permit it. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据