4.8 Article

A sensitive NADH and glucose biosensor tuned by visible light based on thionine bridged carbon nanotubes and gold nanoparticles multilayer

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 951-957

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2008.07.066

关键词

Glucose dehydrogenase; NADH; Biosensor; Multiwalled carbon nanotube; Thionine; Gold nanoparticles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20575064, 20675076]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A NADH and glucose biosensor based on thionine cross-linked multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) and Au nanoparticles (Au NPs) multilayer functionalized indium-doped tin oxide (ITO) electrode were presented in this paper. The effect of light irradiation on the enhancement of bioelectrocatalytic processes of the biocatalytic systems by the photovoltaic effect was investigated. This bioelectrode exhibited excellent catalytic activity of the oxidation towards dihydronicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH). Most interesting, the performance of this NADH sensor could be tuned by the visible light. When the biosensor was performed in the dark, the anodic current increased linearly with NADH concentration over the range from 0.5 to 237 mu M with detection limit 0.1 mu M and sensitivity 17 nA mu M-1. The sensitivity became 115 nA mu M-1 with detection limit 0.05 mu M with the light irradiation. Compared with the reaction in dark, the sensitivity increased around 7 folds while the detection limit decreased 2 folds. The glucose biosensor also exhibited the same behavior. The linear range was from 10 mu M to 2.56 mM with the sensitivity of 7.8 mu A mM(-1) and detection limit 5.0 mu M in the dark. After the light irradiation, the linear range was from 1 mu M to 3.25 mM with the sensitivity of 18.5 mu A mM(-1) and detection limit 0.7 mu M. It indicated a potential to provide an operational access to develop new kinds of photocontrolled dehydrogenase enzyme-based bioelectronics. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据