4.6 Review

Multifaceted link between cancer and inflammation

期刊

BIOSCIENCE REPORTS
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 1-15

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BSR20100136

关键词

activator protein 1 (AP-1); hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha); matrix metalloproteinase (MMP); nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B); oncogene; signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)

资金

  1. NUS [R-184-000-177-112, R-184-000-170-112]
  2. National Kidney Foundation [R-184-000-196-592]
  3. National Medical Research Council of Singapore [R-713-000-124-213]
  4. Cancer Science Institute of Singapore [R-713-001-011-271]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing evidence from epidemiological, preclinical and clinical studies suggests that dysregulated inflammatory response plays a pivotal role in a multitude of chronic ailments including cancer. The molecular mechanism(s) by which chronic inflammation drives cancer initiation and promotion include increased production of pro-inflammatory mediators, such as cytokines, chemokines, reactive oxygen intermediates, increased expression of oncogenes, COX-2 (cyclo-oxygenase-2), 5-LOX (5-lipoxygenase) and MMPs (matrix metalloproteinases), and pro-inflammatory transcription factors such as NF-kappa B (nuclear factor kappa B), STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), AP-1 (activator protein 1) and HIF-1 alpha (hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha) that mediate tumour cell proliferation, transformation, metastasis, survival, invasion, angiogenesis, chemoresistance and radioresistance. These inflammation-associated molecules are activated by a number of environmental and lifestyle-related factors including infectious agents, tobacco, stress, diet, obesity and alcohol, which together are thought to drive as much as 90% of all cancers. The present review will focus primarily on the role of various inflammatory intermediates responsible for tumour initiation and progression, and discuss in detail the critical link between inflammation and cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据