4.2 Article

Fast Determination of Copper Content in Tobacco (Nicotina tabacum L.) Leaves Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy with Univariate and Multivariate Analysis

期刊

TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE
卷 61, 期 3, 页码 821-829

出版社

AMER SOC AGRICULTURAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.13031/trans.12393

关键词

Copper content; Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy; Multivariate calibration; Response surface methodology; Tobacco leaves; Univariate calibration

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [31671579, 31701320]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018FZA5007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fast and effective measures to determine heavy metals play an important role in ensuring food quality and safety. In this experiment, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) was used to detect copper content (Cu) in tobacco (Nicotina tabacum L.) leaves. The experimental parameters for detection, including laser energy, delay time, and camera gate width, were optimized by response surface methodology (RSM). Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, including partial least squares regression (PLSR) and extreme learning machine (ELM), were used to establish calibration models. In addition, different preprocessing methods were used to eliminate the signal variations and further improve the calibration performance, including baseline correction, background normalization, area normalization, and standard normal variate (SNV) normalization. The results showed that LIBS combined with both univariate and multivariate methods could be used to detect copper content in tobacco leaves. SNV and area normalization were efficient in dealing with signal variations and improving the calibration performance. The ELM model with SNV normalized variables in the spectral region of 324.02 to 325.98 nm achieved the best performance (R-2 = 0.9552 and RMSE = 4.8416 mg kg(-1) in the testing set). The results provide the first proof-of-principle data for fast determination of copper content in tobacco leaves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据