4.4 Article

Fangchinoline Induced G1/S Arrest by Modulating Expression of p27, PCNA, and Cyclin D in Human Prostate Carcinoma Cancer PC3 Cells and Tumor Xenograft

期刊

BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 74, 期 3, 页码 488-493

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1271/bbb.90490

关键词

prostate cancer; fangchinoline; human prostate cancer cell lines (PC3); tumor xenograft; apoptosis

资金

  1. State Key Basic Research and Development Plan of China [2002CB111302]
  2. Prominent National Scientific Project of the Culture of Original Transgenic Species [2008ZX08002-004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prostate cancer (PCA) is the most common invasive malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in males. The present study investigated the effects of fangchinoline (Fan), an important compound in Stephania Tetradra S. Moore (Fenfangji) with pain-relieving, blood pressure-depressing, and antibiotic activities, on human PCA. It was found that Fan inhibited human prostate cancer cell lines (PC3) cell proliferation in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Studies of cell-cycle progression showed that the anti-proliferative effect of Fan was associated with an increase in the G1/S phase of PC3 cells. Western blot results indicated that Fan-induced G1/S phase arrest was mediated through inhibition of cyclin-regulated signaling pathways. Fan induced p27 expression and inhibited cyclin D and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression in PC3 cells. Increased exposure time to Fan caused apoptosis of PC3 cells, which was associated with up-regulation of pro-apoptotic proteins Bax and caspase 3, and down-regulation of antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2. Furthermore, Fan had anti-tumorigenic activity in viva, including reduction of tumor volume and pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative effects in a PC3 nude mouse xenograft. Taking all this together, it can be concluded that Fan is an effective anti-proliferative agent that modulates cell growth regulators in prostate cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据