4.8 Article

GADD45 beta Loss Ablates Innate Immunosuppression in Cancer

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 78, 期 5, 页码 1275-1292

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1833

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [A15115]
  2. Medical Research Council (MRC) [MR/L005069/1]
  3. Bloodwise project grant [15003]
  4. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) [1432, 5172, 15585]
  5. MIUR PRIN grant [2009EWAW4M_003]
  6. MIUR FIRB grant [RBA-P10A9H9]
  7. L'Aquila University PhD program in Experimental Medicine
  8. L'Aquila University PhD program in Biotechnology
  9. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA098583, R01CA084040] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. Cancer Research UK [15115] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Medical Research Council [MR/L005069/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. MRC [MR/L005069/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

T-cell exclusion from the tumor microenvironment (TME) is a major barrier to overcoming immune escape. Here, we identify a myeloid-intrinsic mechanism governed by the NF-kappa B effector molecule GADD45 beta that restricts tumor-associated inflammation and T-cell trafficking into tumors. In various models of solid cancers refractory to immunotherapies, including hepatocellular carcinoma and ovarian adenocarcinoma, Gadd45 beta inhibition in myeloid cells restored activation of proinflammatory tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and intratumoral immune infiltration, thereby diminishing oncogenesis. Our results provide a basis to interpret clinical evidence that elevated expression of GADD45B confers poor clinical outcomes in most human cancers. Furthermore, they suggest a therapeutic target in GADD45 beta for reprogramming TAM to overcome immunosuppression and T-cell exclusion from the TME. Significance: These findings define a myeloid-based immune checkpoint that restricts T-cell trafficking into tumors, with potentially important therapeutic implications to generally improve the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. (C) 2017 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据