4.7 Article

Binder-free, freestanding cathodes fabricated with an ultra-rapid diffusion of sulfur into carbon nanofiber mat for lithium-sulfur batteries

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY ENERGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 336-344

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtener.2018.06.004

关键词

Lithium-sulfur batteries; Sulfur deposition; Electrospinning; Freestanding; Binder-free

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI 1537827, CBET 1236466]
  2. Welch Foundation [F-1254]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A rapid (5-s) sulfur deposition technique is demonstrated on electrospun carbon nanofibers to fabricate binder-free, freestanding cathodes for lithium-sulfur batteries. The 5-second procedure melts sulfur into carbon nanofiber mats, which play a significant role as a built-in conductive matrix to provide uninterrupted electron transport pathways throughout the electrode such that the heavy current collector is eliminated. Meanwhile, the large inter-fiber spacing facilitates electrolyte diffusion and provides sufficient space for sulfur integration during cathode fabrication and the volume expansion during lithium-sulfur redox reaction. This technique eliminates the need for slurry processing with insulating binders and toxic solvents while eliminating heavy current collectors. This ultra-rapid technique involving only 140 degrees C, 5 s, and slight pressure (<250 psi) offers a practical approach to light-weight sulfur cathodes compared to the conventional sulfur melt deposition techniques requiring high temperatures (155-300 degrees C), long times (8-10 h), and heavy components in the cell assembly. The cathodes thus obtained deliver a discharge capacity of similar to 550 mAh g(sulfur)(-1) owing to their simple construction, with 100% capacity retention at 0.5C rate over 150 cycles. This translates to similar to 250 mA h g(electrode)(-1) (based on total mass at the cathode) which is comparable to highly sophisticated electrodes when the weight of the entire electrode and current collector is considered. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据