4.5 Article

Bio-based polymers production in a kraft lignin biorefinery: techno-economic assessment

期刊

BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 239-250

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1834

关键词

biorefinery; kraft lignin, de-polymerized kraft lignin; bio-polyols; biophenols; techno-economic analysis

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. Ontario government via an NSERC
  3. NSERC/FPInnovations Industrial Research Chair program
  4. ORF-RE grant in Forest Biorefinery
  5. NSERC Biomaterials and Chemicals Strategic Research Network (Lignoworks)
  6. Canada-Brazil Science Without Borders/CNPq Graduate Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a techno-economic and risk analysis of a kraft lignin (KL) biorefinery (3000 tonne of KL.yeal(-1) capacity), where KL is depolymerized to produce depolymerized kraft lignin (DKL) as a bio-substitute to polyol and phenol for the production of bio-based polymers (polyurethane and phenolic resins). Three scenarios were examined: (i) DKL as a phenol substitute, (H) DKL as a polyol substitute, and (Hi) oxypropylated depolymerized kraft lignin (Oxy-DKL) a polyol substitute. The Net Present Value was calculated to compare these scenarios. To address the uncertainty risks in feed-stock and product price, a sensitivity analysis and a Monte Carlo simulation were performed. Results show that DKL and Oxy-DKL derived from the KL biorefinery are a feasible bio-substitute for petroleum-based polyols with a minimum selling price of 1440 and 1623 US$.t(-1), respectively. However, DKL is likely not feasible when replacing phenol (minimum selling price of 1421 US$.t(-1)) due to the current low market price of phenol. The feasibility of the KL biorefinery is highly sensitive to the market prices of the products. Feedstock supply and market demand for lignin-derived biopolyols are still uncertain; therefore, a supply chain design model is necessary for decision-making. (C) 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据