4.7 Article

Integrating Science and Policy: A Case Study of the Hubbard Brook Research Foundation Science Links Program

期刊

BIOSCIENCE
卷 61, 期 10, 页码 791-801

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.10.9

关键词

interaction of scientists; integrating science and policy; environmental challenges; science communication; boundary-spanning programs

类别

资金

  1. NSF through the LTER [DEB-042359]
  2. Jessie B. Cox Charitable Trust
  3. Davis Conservation Foundation
  4. Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation
  5. McCabe Environmental Fund
  6. Merck
  7. John Merck Fund
  8. Harold Whitworth Pierce Charitable Trust
  9. Sudbury Foundation
  10. New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
  11. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
  12. Division Of Environmental Biology
  13. Direct For Biological Sciences [1114804] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scientists, related professionals, and the public have for decades called for greater interaction among scientists, policymakers, and the media to address contemporary environmental challenges. Practical examples of effective real-world programs designed to catalyze interactions and provide relevant science are few. Existing successful models can be used, however, to develop and expand the work of integrating, synthesizing, and communicating ecosystem science for environmental policy and natural-resource management.. We provide an overview of the structure and strategies used in the Hubbard Brook Research Foundation Science Links program, now in its thirteenth year as a successful boundary-spanning organization. We detail project activities and results and share lessons and challenges for the further advancement of Science Links and other efforts to bridge the science policy divide. Furthermore, we suggest greater emphasis in boundary-spanning programs as a part of publicly funded research initiatives and as legitimate scholarly endeavors that support the scaled coproduction of knowledge and that harness scientific research to support informed policy and environmental management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据