期刊
BIOSCIENCE
卷 61, 期 8, 页码 619-625出版社
AMER INST BIOLOGICAL SCI
DOI: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.8.8
关键词
academic assessment; systematic biology; scientific productivity; digital objects; curation of natural history collections
类别
资金
- National Science Foundation [DEB-0935231]
- Direct For Biological Sciences
- Division Of Environmental Biology [0935231] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- Direct For Biological Sciences
- Div Of Biological Infrastructure [743783] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Stimulated in large part by the advent of the Internet, research productivity in many academic disciplines has changed dramatically over the last two decades. However, the assessment system that governs professional success has not kept pace, creating a mismatch between modes of scholarly productivity and academic assessment criteria. In this article, we describe the problem and present ideas for solutions. We argue that adjusting assessment criteria to correspond to modern scholarly productivity is essential for the success of individual scientists and of our discipline as a whole. The authors and endorsers of this article commit to a number of actions that constitute steps toward ensuring that all forms of scholarly productivity are credited. The emphasis here is on systematic biology, but we are not alone in experiencing this mismatch between productivity and assessment. An additional goal in this article is to begin a conversation about the problem with colleagues in other subdisciplines of biology.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据