4.6 Review

Cloud decision support model for selecting hotels on TripAdvisor.com with probabilistic linguistic information

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.10.001

关键词

Decision support model; Hotel selection; Probabilistic linguistic information; Cloud model; Information fusion tool

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71571193]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hotel selection on tourism websites has been a prevailing trend in traveling in recent years, and selecting a suitable hotel is a high-risk decision for millions of tourists because of the intrinsic imperceptibility of the provided products. Decision support models for hotel selection have drawn the interest of numerous scholars. The problem is that some existing models cannot address substantial amounts of online information, and they neglect the influence of interrelationships among different criteria on tourists' decisions. To cover these defects, an applicable hotel decision support model is developed for tourists utilizing online reviews on TripAdvisor.com. Considering a great deal of review information associated with hotels posted by numerous tourists on TripAdvisor.com, probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs) are introduced to summarize this information statistically. Processing qualitative concepts requires effective support of reliable tools; then, a cloud model can be employed to deal with probabilistic linguistic information. First, PLTSs are converted, and a novel concept of probabilistic linguistic integrated cloud (PLIC) is proposed. Moreover, the essential algorithms and distance measure of PLICs are defined. Two information fusion tools are subsequently presented based on Heronian mean operator. Then, the hotel decision support model is established. Finally, a hotel selection problem on TripAdvisor.com is provided to demonstrate the model. Its stability and validity are further verified by a sensitivity analysis and comparison with other extant methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据