4.7 Article

CASH: a constructing comprehensive splice site method for detecting alternative splicing events

期刊

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 905-917

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbx034

关键词

alternative splicing; RNA-seq; SRSF10; splicing model; evolution

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M541564, 2014T70439]
  2. SANOFI-SIBS young scientist scholarship
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31400677, 31570818, 31370786]
  4. Foundation of Tianjin Medical University [2014KYQ02, ZYYFY038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) can generate millions of reads to provide clues for analyzing novel or abnormal alternative splicing (AS) events in cells. However, current methods for exploring AS events are still far from being satisfactory. Here, we present Comprehensive AS Hunting (CASH), which constructs comprehensive splice sites including known and novel AS sites in cells, and identifies differentially AS events between cells. We illuminated the versatility of CASH on RNA-seq data from a wide range of species and also on simulated in silico data, validated the advantages of CASH over other AS predictors and exhibited novel differentially AS events. Moreover, we used CASH to identify SRSF10-regulated AS events and investigated the evolution of SRSF10-regulated splicing. The results showed that SRSF10-regulated splicing events are highly evolvable from chickens, mice to humans. However, SRSF10-regulated splicing model was observed to be immutable, in which SRSF10 binding to cassette exon promotes exon inclusion while binding to downstream exon induces exon skipping. Altogether, CASH can significantly improve the detection of AS events and facilitate the study of AS regulation and function in cells; the SRSF10 data first demonstrate a flexibility of SRSF10 with their regulated splicing events but an immutability of SRSF10-regulated splicing model to produce opposite AS outcomes in vertebrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据