4.4 Article

Measuring success: Within and cross-domain predictors of academic and social trajectories in elementary school

期刊

EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH QUARTERLY
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 112-125

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.04.001

关键词

School readiness; Academic and social trajectories; Kindergarten predictors; Elementary school outcomes; Skill acquisition; Longitudinal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Children's skill levels in language, mathematics, literacy, self-regulation, and social-emotional adjustment at kindergarten entry are believed to play an important role in determining school success through their long-term association with academic and social skills in primary and secondary education. Hence, children's school readiness is a national priority. To date, there is some evidence that specific individual school readiness skills relate to specific outcomes, but much of that research has not addressed concerns regarding generalization due to the high levels of correlations among the school readiness skills. The interrelationships among school readiness domains and patterns of skill acquisition - during the first three years of primary education in which basic skills are the focus and in the later years of primary or secondary education when higher-order skills are the focus - have not been explored adequately. Using the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development dataset (n = 1364), this research conducted growth curve analyses to examine a comprehensive set of readiness indicators in kindergarten and identify which domains were stronger predictors of academic and social trajectories through grade 3 and from grades 3 to 5. Results highlight the importance of examining multiple school readiness domains simultaneously rather than separately, and moving beyond outcomes (skill levels) at a particular grade to consider which kindergarten skills predict gains over time (skill acquisition) both within- and across-domains. Empirical and methodological implications are considered for educational research, policy, and practice. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据