3.9 Article

Different Behaviours of the Ross and Weddell Seas Surface Heat Fluxes in the Period 1972-2015

期刊

CLIMATE
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cli6010017

关键词

surface heat fluxes; El Nino-Southern Oscillation; Southern Annular Mode; Ross and Weddell Seas

资金

  1. Universita degli Studi di Napoli 'Parthenope' under Bando di sostegno alla ricerca individuale per il triennio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Operational analyses and re-analyses, provided by ECMWF for the period 1972-2015, were used to investigate the behaviour of the surface heat fluxes between ocean and atmosphere, estimated via empirical formulae, over the Ross and Weddell Seas. The presence and thickness of sea ice cover, which strongly affects ocean-atmosphere interactions, was estimated through Special Sensor Microwave Imager and Special Sensor Microwave Imager Sounder brightness temperatures. Because of the lack of ice information before 1992, daily averaged ice and snow thickness obtained from the 1992-2012 dataset has been used as a 'climatological year' for the 1972-2015 period. The heat loss in the Ross Sea reached its maximum in 2008 (-98 W.mu m(-2)) and its minimum (-58 W.mu m(-2)) in 1980, while in the Weddell Sea, it ranged between 65 W.mu m(-2) (1999) and 99 W.mu m(-2) (2015). Results showed that the surface heat fluxes behaviour in the two seas moved from opposite to synchronous during the study period. The wavelet analysis was applied to evaluate if this result might be linked to the signature of global climate variability expressed by El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and Southern Annular Mode (SAM). The synchronous behaviour of the surface heat fluxes in the Ross and Weddell seas, observed since 2001, coincides with a change in the energy peak associated to the time scale of the SAM variability, which moved from 32 to 64 months during 1990s. This change generates a common energy peak for the SAM and ENSO with a lagged in phase relationship between the signals, possibly influencing the behaviour of the surface heat fluxes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据