4.6 Article

Exponentially more precise quantum simulation of fermions in the configuration interaction representation

期刊

QUANTUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/aa9463

关键词

quantum algorithm; electronic structure; quantum chemistry; quantum simulation

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT100100761]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP160102426]
  3. National Science Foundation [PHY-0955518]
  4. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-12-1-0046]
  5. Army Research Office [W911NF-15-1-0256]
  6. Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship program - Basic Research Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering
  7. Office of Naval Research [N00014-16-1-2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a quantum algorithm for the simulation of molecular systems that is asymptotically more efficient than all previous algorithms in the literature in terms of the main problem parameters. As in Babbush et al (2016 New Journal of Physics 18, 033032), we employ a recently developed technique for simulating Hamiltonian evolution using a truncated Taylor series to obtain logarithmic scaling with the inverse of the desired precision. The algorithm of this paper involves simulation under an oracle for the sparse, first-quantized representation of the molecular Hamiltonian known as the configuration interaction (CI) matrix. We construct and query the CI matrix oracle to allow for on-the-fly computation of molecular integrals in a way that is exponentially more efficient than classical numerical methods. Whereas second-quantized representations of the wavefunction require (O) over tilde (N) qubits, where N is the number of single-particle spin-orbitals, the CI matrix representation requires (O) over tilde(eta) qubits, where eta << N is the number of electrons in the molecule of interest. We show that the gate count of our algorithm scales at most as ($) over tilde(eta(2)N(3)t).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据