4.8 Article

Effect of granular activated carbon addition on the effluent properties and fouling potentials of membrane-coupled expanded granular sludge bed process

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 240-246

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.080

关键词

Membrane-coupled anaerobic process; Membrane fouling; Granular activated carbon; Membrane resistance; Soluble microbial products

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51038003]
  2. Funds for Creative Research Groups of China [51121062]
  3. Industry-University-Research Collaboration Project of Guangdong Province & Chinese Ministry of Education [2012B091000029]
  4. Key Breakthrough Project of Guangdong Hong Kong [2012BZ100021]
  5. Industry-University-Research Collaboration Project of Chancheng District [2012107101169]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To mitigate membrane fouling of membrane-coupled anaerobic process, granular activated carbon (GAC: 50 g/L) was added into an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB). A short-term ultrafiltration test was investigated for analyzing membrane fouling potential and underlying fouling mechanisms. The results showed that adding GAC into the EGSB not only improved the COD removal efficiency, but also alleviated membrane fouling efficiently because GAC could help to reduce soluble microbial products, polysaccharides and proteins by 26.8%, 27.8% and 24.7%, respectively, compared with the control system. Furthermore, excitation emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy analysis revealed that GAC addition mainly reduced tryptophan protein-like, aromatic protein-like and fulvic-like substances. In addition, the resistance distribution analysis demonstrated that adding GAC primarily decreased the cake layer resistance by 53.5%. The classic filtration mode analysis showed that cake filtration was the major fouling mechanism for membrane-coupled EGSB process regardless of the GAC addition. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据