4.8 Article

Combining microbial cultures for efficient production of electricity from butyrate in a microbial electrochemical cell

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 169, 期 -, 页码 169-174

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.090

关键词

Short chain fatty acids; Fermentation; Geobacter; Syntrophy; Microbial fuel cell

资金

  1. combination of the Biological Design Graduate Program at Arizona State University
  2. Science Foundation Arizona Fellowship
  3. Arizona State University Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology
  4. Academia Mexicana de Ciencias (AMC)
  5. Fundacion Mexico-Estados Unidos (FUMEC)
  6. NSF [1053939]
  7. Torres by United States Office of Naval Research Grant [N00014-10-M-0231]
  8. Directorate For Engineering
  9. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1053939] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Butyrate is an important product of anaerobic fermentation; however, it is not directly used by characterized strains of the highly efficient anode respiring bacteria (ARB) Geobacter sulfurreducens in microbial electrochemical cells. By combining a butyrate-oxidizing community with a Geobacter rich culture, we generated a microbial community which outperformed many naturally derived communities found in the literature for current production from butyrate and rivaled the highest performing natural cultures in terms of current density (similar to 11 A/m(2)) and Coulombic efficiency (similar to 70%). Microbial community analyses support the shift in the microbial community from one lacking efficient ARB in the marine hydrothermal vent community to a community consisting of similar to 80% Geobacter in the anode biofilm. This demonstrates the successful production and adaptation of a novel microbial culture for generating electrical current from butyrate with high current density and high Coulombic efficiency, by combining two mixed microbial cultures containing complementing biochemical pathways. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据