4.8 Article

Strategic enhancement of algal biomass, nutrient uptake and lipid through statistical optimization of nutrient supplementation in coupling Scenedesmus obliquus-like microalgae cultivation and municipal wastewater treatment

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 71-79

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.060

关键词

Microalgae biofuels; Wastewater treatment; Optimization of nutrient addition; Plackett-Burman design; Response surface methodology

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20976139, 41070641, 51138009]
  3. National Key Technologies R&D Program of China [2012BAJ25B02]
  4. New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-11-0391]
  5. Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [11QH1402600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supplementing proper nutrients could be a strategy for enhancing algal biomass, nutrients uptake and lipid accumulation in the coupling system of biodiesel production and municipal wastewater treatment. However, there is scant information reporting systematic studies on screening and optimization of key supplemented components in the coupling system. The main factors were scientifically screened and optimized using statistical methods. Plackett-Burman design (PBD) was used to explore the roles of added nutrient factors, whereas response surface methodology (RSM) was employed for optimization. Based on the statistic analysis, the optimum added TP and FeCl3 center dot 6H(2)O concentrations for Scenedesmus obliquus-like microalgae growth, nutrients uptake and lipid accumulation were 4.41 mg L-1 and 6.48 mg L-1, respectively. The corresponding biomass, lipid content and TN/TP removal efficiency were 1.46 g L-1, 36.26% and >99%. The predicted value agreed well with the experimental value, as determined by validation experiments, which confirmed the availability and accuracy of the model. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据