4.8 Article

Environmental and economic assessment of integrated systems for dairy manure treatment coupled with algae bioenergy production

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 130, 期 -, 页码 486-494

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.123

关键词

Algae; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Manure management; Nutrients

资金

  1. G. Unger Vetlesen Foundation
  2. Fund for Excellence in Science and Technology (FEST) at the University of Virginia
  3. US National Science Foundation [CBET-1067563]
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1067563] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) are used to investigate integrated algae bioenergy production and nutrient management on small dairy farms. Four cases are considered: a reference land-application scenario (REF), anaerobic digestion with land-application of liquid digestate (AD), and anaerobic digestion with recycling of liquid digestate to either an open-pond algae cultivation system (UPS) or an algae turf scrubber (ATS). LCA indicates that all three improved scenarios (AD, UPS, and ATS) are environmentally favorable compared to REF, exhibiting increases in net energy output up to 854 GJ/yr, reductions in net eutrophication potential up to 2700 kg PO4-eq/yr, and reductions in global warming potential up to 196 Mg CO2-eq/yr. LCC reveals that the integrated algae systems are much more financially attractive than either AD or REF, whereby net present values (NPV) are as follows: $853,250 for OPS, $790,280 for ATS, $62,279 for REF, and $211,126 for AD. However, these results are highly dependent on the sale price for nutrient credits. Comparison of LCA and LCC results indicates that robust nutrient credit markets or other policy tools are required to align financial and environmental preferability of energy production systems and foster widespread adoption of sustainable nutrient management systems. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据