4.7 Review

Inorganic p-Type Semiconductors as Hole Conductor Building Blocks for Robust Perovskite Solar Cells

期刊

ADVANCED SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
卷 2, 期 8-9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adsu.201800032

关键词

efficiency; hole transport materials; inorganic p-type semiconductors; perovskite solar cells; stability

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Discovery Projects (ARC DPs)
  2. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT) programs
  3. UQ Development Fellowship
  4. Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology
  5. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP)
  6. UQ Centennial Scholarships

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic-inorganic halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have attracted considerable scientific and industrial interest because of their high efficiency and solution processability. As a key component, hole transport materials (HTMs) are critically important for achieving efficient hole extraction and thus high performance. However, the commonly employed organic HTMs such as 2,2',7,7'-tetrakis(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenylamine)-9,9'-spiro-bifuorene and poly(triarylamine) (PTAA) are quite expensive due to their complicated synthesis procedures and high purity requirements. Moreover, the instability of these organic compounds further hinders the large-scale commercialization of PSCs. To address these issues, various inorganic p-type semiconductors featuring excellent chemical stability, high hole mobility, and suitable energy levels are investigated as promising alternatives to their organic counterparts. Herein, recent advances of inorganic hole conductors for PSCs with a focus on low-cost fabrication and enhanced long-term stability are reviewed. A series of unexplored inorganic p-type semiconductors with desirable optoelectronic properties are also highlighted as promising candidates. In addition, the current challenges and potential strategies are presented to reveal the future opportunities in this research field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据