4.8 Article

Utilization of rice husks modified by organomultiphosphonic acids as low-cost biosorbents for enhanced adsorption of heavy metal ions

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 420-424

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.075

关键词

Agricultural waste adsorbent; Rice husk; Modification; Organomultiphosphonic acid; Heavy metal removal

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51102127, 51073075, 51373074, 51302127, 51143006]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [2009ZRB01463, 2008BS04011, Y2007B19]
  3. Nature Science Foundation of Ludong University [08-CXA001, 032912, 042920, LY20072902]
  4. Educational Project for Postgraduate of Ludong University [YD05001, Ycx0612]
  5. Program for Scientific research innovation team in Colleges and universities of Shandong Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel biosorbent materials (RH-2 and RH-3) obtained from agricultural waste materials rice husks (RH-1) were successfully developed through fast and facile esterification reactions with hydroxylethylidenediphosphonic acid and nitrilotrimethylenetriphosphonic acid, respectively. The present paper reported the feasibility of using RH-1, RH-2 and RH-3 for removal of heavy metals from simulated wastewater, the results revealed that the adsorption property of functionalized rice husks with organotriphosphonic acid RH-3 for Au(III) was very excellent, especially for gold ions. The combined effect of initial solution pH, RH-3 dosage and initial Au(III) concentration was investigated using response surface methodology (RSM), the results showed that initial Au(III) concentration exerted stronger influence on Au(III) uptake than initial pH and biomass dosage. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the quadratic model demonstrated that the model was highly significant, and under the optimum process conditions, the maximum adsorption capacity could reach 3.25 +/- 0.07 mmol/g that is higher than other reported adsorbents. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据