4.5 Article

The mediation role of leadership styles in integrated project collaboration: An emotional intelligence perspective

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 317-330

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.08.014

关键词

Integrated project delivery; Emotional intelligence; Leadership styles; Collaboration satisfaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71572126]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on integrated project delivery (IPD) has considered collaboration satisfaction as an important factor for improving project outcomes. Yet, the potential mechanism influencing it remains unexplored in construction project management, especially in the aspects of human skills. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether leadership styles mediate the link between the emotional intelligence (EI) of authorized leader and four collaboration satisfaction outcomes perceived by other participants in an integrated team: performance contribution satisfaction (PCS), efficiency satisfaction (ES), relationship satisfaction (RS), and interests satisfaction (IS). Data was collected from 365 samples including project leaders and scholars who possess experience of IPD in China. The results show that transformational and active-transactional leadership fully mediate the relationships of EI with PCS, ES, and IS, and were partial mediators between RI and RS. In addition, the partial mediation role of passive transactional leadership in the relationships of EI with RS and IS were identified, but its mediating effects between PCS and ES were not found. Similarly, owing to the non-significant effects of laissez-faire leadership on dimensions of collaboration satisfaction, this leadership style does not play mediating role in the relationships of EI with four dimensions of collaboration satisfaction. This paper makes contribution to the mediating mechanism research of revised full range leadership model by proposing collaboration satisfaction criteria and EI model in IPD project. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd, APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据