4.7 Article

Beyond Energies: Geometries of Nonbonded Molecular Complexes as Metrics for Assessing Electronic Structure Approaches

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 1481-1492

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct501050s

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences [DE-FG02-12ER16362]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electronic structure approaches for calculating intermolecular interactions have traditionally been benchmarked almost exclusively on the basis of energy-centric metrics. Herein, we explore the idea of utilizing a metric related to geometry. On a diverse series of noncovalently interacting systems of different sizes, from the water dimer to the coronene dimer, we evaluate a variety of electronic structure approximations with respect to their abilities to reproduce coupled-cluster-level geometries. Specifically, we examine Hartree-Fock, second-order Moller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), attenuated MP2, scaled MP2, and a number of density functionals, many of which include empirical or nonempirical van der Waals dispersion corrections. We find a number of trends that transcend system size and interaction type. For instance, functionals incorporating VV10 nonlocal correlation tend to yield highly accurate geometries; omega B97X-V and B97M-V, in particular, stand out. We establish that intermolecular distance, as measured by, e.g., the center-of-mass separation of two molecules, is the geometric parameter that deviates most profoundly among the various methods. This property of the equilibrium intermolecular separation, coupled with its accessibility via a small series of well-defined single-point calculations, makes it an ideal metric for the development and evaluation of electronic structure methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据