4.3 Article

Genome-wide Analysis of Alternative Splicing in An Inbred Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) Line 'HO' in Response to Heat Stress

期刊

CURRENT GENOMICS
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 12-20

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1389202918666170705151901

关键词

Alternative splicing; Cabbage; Heat shock; Heat shock transcription factor; Heat shock protein; Transcriptome

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs [114061-3, 115076-2]
  2. KRIBB Initiative Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: High-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) studies demonstrate that Alternative Splicing (AS) is a widespread mechanism that enhances transcriptome diversity, particularly in plants exposed to environmental stress. In an attempt to determine the transcriptome and AS patterns of cabbage inbred line HO under Heat Stress (HS), RNA-Seq was carried out using HS-treated and control samples. Genome-wide analysis indicated that AS is differentially regulated in response to HS. The number of AS events markedly increased in HS-treated samples compared to the control. Conclusion: We identified 1,864 genes, including Heat shock transcription factor (Hsf) and heat shock protein (Hsp) genes, that exhibited >4-fold changes in expression upon exposure to HS. The enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms of the 1,864 genes included 'response to stress/abiotic stimulus/chemical stimulus', among, which the genes most highly induced by HS encode small Hsps and Hsf proteins. The heat-induced genes also showed an increased number of AS events under HS conditions. In addition, the distribution of AS types was altered under HS conditions, as the level of Intron Retention (IR) decreased, whereas other types of AS increased, under these conditions. Severe HS-induced AS was also observed in Hsfs and Hsps, which play crucial roles in regulating heat tolerance. Our results support the notion that AS of HS-related genes, such as HsfA2 and HsfB2a, are important for heat stress adaptation in cabbage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据