4.2 Article

The relation between outcome expectation, therapeutic alliance, and outcome among depressed patients in group cognitive-behavioral therapy

期刊

PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 446-456

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2016.1218089

关键词

outcome expectation; alliance; outcome; group CBT; depression; mediation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Although patients' expectation for improvement correlates with their treatment outcome, there remains limited information regarding the mechanisms through which outcome expectation influences outcome. Although several studies have revealed alliance as a mediator of the expectancy-outcome relation, most have focused on individual psychotherapy only. More research is needed examining mediators, including alliance quality, of the outcome expectation-outcome relation in group therapy. Method: This study focused on such associative chains among 91 depressed outpatients who completed 10 weeks of group cognitive-behavioral therapy. We conducted simple and multiple mediation analyses, accounting for the nested data structure. Results: As predicted, we found: (i) The relations between baseline outcome expectation and both posttreatment anxiety and depression were mediated by alliance quality; (ii) the early therapy outcome expectation-posttreatment anxiety relation was mediated by mid-treatment alliance; (iii) the relation between early alliance and posttreatment interpersonal problems was mediated by during-therapy outcome expectation; and (iv) the relation between baseline outcome expectation and posttreatment interpersonal problems was mediated by two variables acting in turn, early alliance and during-therapy outcome expectation. All other tested models were not significant. Conclusions: Results suggest that bidirectional relations between outcome expectation and alliance, with both directions influencing outcome. Clinical and empirical implications are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据