4.8 Article

Prokaryotic diversity and dynamics in a full-scale municipal solid waste anaerobic reactor from start-up to steady-state conditions

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 373-383

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.136

关键词

Municipal solid waste anaerobic reactor; 16S rDNA clone library; Real-time PCR; DGGE; FISH/CARD-FISH

资金

  1. Methanum Environmental and Energy Solutions
  2. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  4. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  5. Pro-reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (PRPq-UFMG)
  6. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prokaryotic diversity of an anaerobic reactor for the treatment of municipal solid waste was investigated over the course of 2 years with the use of 16S rDNA-targeted molecular approaches. The fermentative Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes predominated, and Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Tenericutes and the candidate division WWE1 were also identified. Methane production was dominated by the hydrogenotrophic Methanomicrobiales (Methanoculleus sp.) and their syntrophic association with acetate-utilizing and propionate-oxidizing bacteria. qPCR demonstrated the predominance of the hydrogenotrophic over aceticlastic Methanosarcinaceae (Methanosarcina sp. and Methanimicrococcus sp.), and Methanosaetaceae (Methanosaeta sp.) were measured in low numbers in the reactor. According to the FISH and CARD-FISH analyses, Bacteria and Archaea accounted for 85% and 15% of the cells, respectively. Different cell counts for these domains were obtained by qPCR versus FISH analyses. The use of several molecular tools increases our knowledge of the prokaryotic community dynamics from start-up to steady-state conditions in a full-scale MSW reactor. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据