4.8 Article

Improving the fermentability of enzymatic hydrolysates of lignocellulose through chemical in-situ detoxification with reducing agents

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 102, 期 2, 页码 1254-1263

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.037

关键词

Lignocellulose hydrolysates; Cellulosic ethanol; Fermentation inhibitors; In-situ detoxification; Reducing agents

资金

  1. Kempe Foundations
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  3. Biorefinery of the Future
  4. SEKAB E-Technology through the Umea University Industrial Graduate School

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inhibitory lignocellulose hydrolysates were treated with the reducing agents dithionite and sulfite to achieve improved fermentability. Addition of these reducing agents (in the concentration range 5.0-17.5 mM) to enzymatic hydrolysates of spruce wood or sugarcane bagasse improved processes based on both SHF (simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation) and SSF (simultaneous saccharification and fermentation). The approach was exemplified in ethanolic fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and by using hydrolysates with sugar concentrations >100 g/L (for SHF) and with 10% dry-matter content (for SSF). In the SHF experiments, treatments with dithionite raised the ethanol productivities of the spruce hydrolysate from 0.2 to 2.5 g x L-1 x h(-1) and of the bagasse hydrolysate from 0.9 to 3.9 g x L-1 x h(-1), values even higher than those of fermentations with reference sugar solutions without inhibitors. Benefits of the approach include that the addition of the reducing agent can be made in-situ directly in the fermentation vessel, that the treatment can be performed at a temperature and pH suitable for fermentation, and that the treatment results in dramatically improved fermentability without degradation of fermentable sugars. The many benefits and the simplicity of the approach offer a new way to achieve more efficient manufacture of fermentation products from lignocellulose hydrolysates. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据