4.5 Article

Key role of activated carbon fibers in enhanced decomposition of pollutants using heterogeneous cobalt/peroxymonosulfate system

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4715

关键词

activated carbon fibers; heterogeneous cobalt catalyst; peroxymonosulfate; enhanced activity; dyes

资金

  1. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [51133006]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51302246]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY14E030013, LY14E030015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDThe development of effective and green peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activation processes has attracted considerable attention and still remains a great challenge in the environmental field. Herein, the cobalt catalyst was innovatively supported onto activated carbon fibers (ACFs) to construct an outstanding heterogeneous catalyst, Co@ACFs, for PMS activation. RESULTSCo@ACFs could effectively activate PMS to decompose dyes with about 100% removal rate in 35 min. Co@ACFs maintained its catalytic ability without detectable Co leaching during repeated batch experiments. More importantly, the catalyst presented an enhanced decomposition performance over most reported heterogeneous Co catalysts due to the significant role of ACFs: (i) high adsorption capacity in favor of the enhanced catalytic activity; (ii) ACFs as an electron donor to accelerate Co-II/Co-III cycle thereby speeding up degradation. Combining electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) with radical scavengers, it was found that both sulfate and hydroxyl radicals (SO4 center dot-, (OH)-O-center dot) were responsible for the degradation of dyes. Unexpectedly, (OH)-O-center dot was the dominant radical, different from the reported mechanism in typical Co/PMS. CONCLUSIONThis study not only paves the way to further develop highly efficient and green PMS activation processes, but also provides a new practical method for application to wastewater remediation. (c) 2015 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据